Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 170
N.6 Entailment after projection
Premises:
𝐼𝐻𝑆
( ), 𝑆⇒𝑇.
Deduce , then .
𝑆
𝑇
Do not deduce
.
𝐼𝐻𝑇
( )
N.7 SF2 ancestry
SF2⇒IHSF1⇒SF1.
N.8 SF2 opposite exclusion
SF2⇒IH¬SM1⇒¬SM1.
N.9 SF4 ancestry chain
SF4⇒SF3⇒SF2⇒SF1.
N.10 SF4 opposite exclusion
SF4⇒¬SM3.
Because SM3⇒SM2⇒SM1, one can also derive that any SM1 state would contradict the projected SF2
exclusion already inherited in the female lineage.
N.11 Depth calculation
Stage-source IH depth is recursively defined, not inferred by visual counting alone.
d_base(SF1)=d_base(SM1)=0.
d(NOT S)=d(S). Negation changes truth-polarity/source content but does not itself add an IH layer.
d(S AND T)=max(d(S),d(T)) for finite conjunctions; for a set-indexed limit closure use the supremum of
constituent depths.
d(IH(S))=d(S)+1. PH(S), UD(S), FD(S), and NOT FD(S) do not themselves add IH depth.
Therefore d(SF8)=7 and d(IH(SF8))=8, so the maximum Stage-source IH depth of SF9 is 8.
For a canonical limit lambda under the Limit-State Closure Constructor,
d(SF^lambda)=sup_{beta<lambda}(d(SF^beta)+1), with the exact male mirror. Consequently
d(SF^omega)=omega under the minimum canonical closure depth. A successor after a limit adds one further
IH layer. This makes Stage-source depth ordinal-valued once transfinite stages are admitted.
Hence d(IH(SF8))=8.
Thus SF9 has maximum Stage-source IH depth 8.
N.12 No IH distribution
Premise
. Projection yields
, hence A and B. It does not yield
or
.
𝐼𝐻𝐴∧𝐵
(
)
𝐴∧𝐵
𝐼𝐻𝐴
( )
𝐼𝐻𝐵
( )
N.13 No PA decomposition under IH
Premise
. Projection yields
. PA irreducibility blocks inference to
and
,
𝐼𝐻𝑃𝐴𝐴∧𝐵
(
)
(
)
𝑃𝐴𝐴∧𝐵
(
)
𝑃𝐴𝐴
( )
𝑃𝐴𝐵
( )
and hence certainly blocks inference to their IH versions.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:170.