Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 169
architecture keeps PA semantically stable and assigns recursive state inheritance to IH, the operator designed for it. M.6 Why the repair is not merely arbitrary stage labeling If the theory merely attached a number to an otherwise identical state, the critique would remain. IH avoids 𝑛 that: each stage has a recursively generated source graph and a provably different maximum inheritance depth. The number summarizes a real formal construction rather than replacing it. M.7 What could still threaten the repair If a future version declares that inheritance provenance is never part of biological state identity and can never affect phenotype, the high-order distinction would become largely extensional bookkeeping. Therefore source-sensitive inheritance is a constitutive HGL rule, not optional prose. Appendix N — IH proof drills N.1 Projection once Premise: 𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ). Conclusion: 𝑆. Rule: IH projection. N.2 Projection twice Premise: 𝐼𝐻𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ) ( ). Conclude , then . 𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ) 𝑆 N.3 Invalid converse Premise . Can we conclude ? No. Construct a model where S is independently instantiated. 𝑆 𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ) N.4 Inherited negation Premise: 𝐼𝐻¬𝑆 ( ). Conclusion: ¬𝑆. N.5 Noninheritance Premise: ¬𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ). No conclusion about or follows without another premise. 𝑆 ¬𝑆
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:169.