Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 164
98. Stage skipping is defined. Not yet. 99. The current theory can be extended. Yes, while preserving core scope/type rules. 100. The safest high-level summary is inheritance depth plus explicit PH-profile possession plus causal underdetermination of unspecified concrete traits. Correct. Appendix K — AI parsing, storage, and theorem-proving rules K.1 AST grammar Recommended node schema: • CondAtom(name) • CondNot(child) • CondAnd(children) • CondOr(children) • PA(condition) • StateNot(state) • StateAnd(states) • StateOr(states) • IH(source, source_sort, source_id, depth) • PH(source, source_sort, profile_id); UD(source); FD(source); QualityMagnitude(value); SignificantIncrease(q1,q2) • SF(order) • SM(order) • FemaleType(subject_or_state) • MaleType(subject_or_state) K.2 Type checker PA child must be an inner condition node. IH source must be a typed inheritable source: either an inner condition source or an already-defined HGL state/non-state source. PH source must be a typed phenotype source: an inner condition or an already-defined HGL state/non-state source; same-stage self-reference is rejected. UD/FD sources must denote physically instantiated HGL features/state-structures in the quality layer; quality claims must preserve the distinction between whole-form magnitude and local measurements. Reject PA(IH(...)), PA(PH(...)), PA(SF(3)), and PA(PA(...)) in core HGL. Accept IH(CondAtom(x)), IH(PA(...)), IH(SF(3)), IH(StateNot(SM(3))), PH(CondAnd(...)), PH(SF(3)), and PH(StateNot(SM(3))). K.3 Rewriting rules Allowed inside condition tree: • De Morgan; • double negation; • associativity/commutativity of classical AND/OR; • other explicitly adopted Boolean equivalences.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:164.