Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 162
12. SF4 subject. Inheritance depth 3. 13. SM4 subject. Inheritance depth 3. 14. SF10 subject. Inheritance depth 9. 15. SF100 subject. Inheritance depth 99. 16. SM100 subject. Inheritance depth 99. 17. SF5 visually resembles SF2. Possible. 18. SF5 and SF4 may overlap heavily in visible phenotype while the additional SF5 novelty is mainly microscopic. Possible. Under the Macroscopic Manifestation Axiom SF5 still has at least some stage-governed macro/outward expression; the point is that the newly diagnostic difference need not be wholly visible. 19. SF5 has a major external difference. Possible but not required. 20. SF5 has more estrogen by definition. False. 21. SM5 has more testosterone by definition. False. 22. SF5 has more stereotypical femininity by definition. False. 23. SM5 has more stereotypical masculinity by definition. False. 24. SF5 is 500% female. False. 25. SM5 is 500% male. False. 26. SF5 is female-typed. True. 27. SM5 is male-typed. True. 28. SF5 implies SF4. True. 29. SM5 implies SM4. True. 30. SF5 implies NOT SM4. True. 31. SM5 implies NOT SF4. True. 32. IH(SF4) implies SF4. True. 33. SF4 implies IH(SF4). Not generally. 34. IH(SF4) and SF4 implies SF3, therefore IH(SF3). Invalid; only SF3 follows. 35. IH(PA(x AND NOT y)) splits into two inherited PA routes. Invalid. 36. PA(NOT(x AND y)) can use De Morgan inside. Yes. 37. NOT PA(x AND y) can become PA(NOT x OR NOT y). Invalid; NOT cannot cross PA. 38. NOT IH(S) can become IH(NOT S). Invalid. 39. IH(NOT S) projects to NOT S. Valid. 40. IH(IH(S)) projects to S. Valid by two projection steps. 41. IH(IH(S)) is the same full state as IH(S). No. 42. PA(PA(x)) is used at SF4. No; ill-typed in core HGL. 43. IH(PA(x)) is legal. Yes. 44. IH(IH(PA(x))) is legal. Yes. 45. SF7 child is sexually mature because stage is high. Not deducible. 46. SF2 adult is less mature because stage is low. Not deducible. 47. SF7 stays SF7 for ten years and matures. Consistent. 48. SM7 stays SM7 for ten years and matures. Consistent. 49. Stage plateau means no phenotype change. False. 50. Phenotype change means stage advanced. False. 51. A visible stage marker could exist. Possible if a causal law specifies it. 52. Every stage must have a visible marker. Not deduced. 53. SF20 has a hidden tissue. Possible, not deduced. 54. SM20 has a hidden tissue. Possible, not deduced. 55. SF20 changes only regulation. Possible. 56. SM20 changes only regulation. Possible. 57. SF20 changes only anatomy. Possible under a suitable map. 58. SF20 changes neither immediately because effects are latent. Possible.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:162.