Hypergendered Logic Source

Hypergendered Logic — Page 104

HGL Source Framework · Page 104 of 293 · Source: Hypergendered Logic

SF^(n+1) = IH(SF^n) AND IH(NOT SM^n) AND PH(SF^n) AND NOT PH(SM^n) AND UD(SF^n) AND NOT 
FD(SF^n), for n >= 2 
The phenotype source SFn itself becomes recursively richer with n. Therefore PHSFn can designate a 
phenotype-profile whose source is a whole state containing deep inheritance and earlier phenotype 
structure. 
The same is true of 
NOT PH(SM_n). 
This makes high-stage Archfemale same-side PH sources whole-state recursive phenotype sources, while 
the opposite side contributes a recursively indexed NOT-PH exclusion rather than a positive nonstate-profile 
source. Under the metaexpression revision, neither PH nor NOT-PH should be confused with Gamma^F_n, 
the global stage rule-function. 
190. Higher Archmale PH-profile recursion (distinct from the Archmanhood 
meta-phenotype) 
Exactly symmetrically, 
SM^(alpha+1) = IH(SM^alpha) AND IH(NOT SF^alpha) AND PH(SM^alpha) AND NOT PH(SF^alpha) AND 
UD(SM^alpha) AND NOT FD(SM^alpha), for every defined ordinal alpha >= 2 
Every conclusion in the female analysis has a male mirror unless an asymmetric causal law is separately 
added. 
191. What can now be logically deduced about phenotype 
The Profile-Exclusion revision expands and sharpens the set of strict logical deductions: each successor 
supplies a positive same-side PH fact and a negative opposite whole-profile fact in addition to the IH and 
quality relations. 
From 
SFn+1 
for 
, one may deduce: 
𝑛≥2
PHSFn, 
NOT PH(SM_n), 
IHSFn, 
and 
IH¬SMn. 
If the phenotype map states 
T∈ΠSFn, 
then 
SFn+1⇒HasT. 
If 
If a separate general-language profile law explicitly introduces U in Profile(NOT SM_n), that law may be used 
only when PH(NOT SM_n) is independently established; canonical SF_(n+1) does not establish it.

Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:104.