Hypergendered Logic Source

Hypergendered Logic — Page 102

HGL Source Framework · Page 102 of 293 · Source: Hypergendered Logic

as a universal logical law. 
An explicit realization law may connect them causally. For example: 
 
𝑃𝐴𝑍
( ) ∧𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑦𝑍, 𝑡
(
) ∧𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑍, 𝑡
(
)⇒𝐶𝑃𝐻𝑍, 𝑡
(
).
Once such a causal law is canonized, a phenotype conclusion can become a causal deduction. 
186. PH versus IH 
Likewise, 
 
𝑃𝐻𝑆
( )≢𝐼𝐻𝑆
( ).
IH tracks inherited property/provenance. PH tracks phenotype-profile possession. 
A useful example is an immature Archfemale. She can inherit a high-order state while some ordinary 
maturity-dependent expression is still developing. Conversely, a phenotype resembling a lower-stage profile 
could arise from another cause without proving the corresponding inheritance relation. 
187. The corrected first-order Suprafemale phenotype architecture 
SF1 is 
SF1 = PA(x AND NOT y) 
This supports several different types of phenotype. 
Type A: joint Suprafemale-source phenotype 
From 
 
𝑃𝐻𝑥∧¬𝑦
(
),
Corrected: SF1 itself is PA-only. SF2 contains PH(SF1), so SF2 irreducibly possesses the complete 
phenotype-profile associated with SF1 as a whole. 
Possible fictional examples, none forced until entered into 
: 
Π 𝑥∧¬𝑦
(
)
•​
a tissue architecture that only exists when XX-positive and non-XY developmental information acts 
as one whole source; 
•​
a cell-signaling arrangement whose geometry is not generated by either component route 
separately; 
•​
an organ-level arrangement that retrospectively looks unmistakably female-directed once its joint 
developmental basis is understood; 
•​
a stage-specific physiological regulation loop; 
•​
a microanatomical feature invisible externally but structurally female-specific in HGL. 
Type B: phenotype of the negated Supramale inner source 
From 
 
𝑃𝐻¬ ¬𝑥∧𝑦
(
)
(
),
Corrected: SF1 itself does not contain a constitutive PH relation. At SF2 the same-side whole-profile 
PH(SF1) is positively possessed, while the complete opposite SM1 whole-profile is explicitly excluded by 
NOT PH(SM1). PH(NOT SM1) remains legal general syntax but is not a constitutive SF2 conjunct. 
By De Morgan, the source is equivalent to 
 
𝑥∨¬𝑦.

Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:102.