Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 71
104. Developmental history can matter even at the same endpoint stage Suppose two Archfemales are both currently . 𝑆𝐹 8 One reached gradually: 𝑆𝐹 8 𝑆𝐹 1 →𝑆𝐹 2 →···→𝑆𝐹 8. Another hypothetical model might allow a rapid transition to . 𝑆𝐹 8 If developmental history matters, then 𝑆1 = 𝑆2 = 𝑆𝐹 8 does not guarantee 𝐵1 = 𝐵2. A history-sensitive causal model can be written 𝐵𝑡 ( ) = Φ 𝑆𝑡 ( ), 𝐷𝑡 ( ), 𝐸𝑡 ( ), 𝐻≤𝑡 ( ), where stores the path taken to the current state. 𝐻≤𝑡 This is another reason not to treat the stage number as a complete biological description. 105. Intrastage emergence Earlier sections emphasized emergence from increasing Suprafemale or Supramale order. The new distinction reveals a second possible source: intrastage emergence. Suppose an Archfemale acquires and remains there. During later maturation, two -compatible 𝑆𝐹 6 𝑆𝐹 6 structures that were previously immature become jointly active. Their interaction may generate a new property even though the stage number does not change: 𝐸 𝑆𝐹𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 6 ⊭ 𝐸, but 𝑆𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 6 ⊨𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑙𝐸. If a causal law explicitly stipulates the relation, becomes causally deducible. Without such a law, it is 𝐸 merely a plausible mechanism. Therefore novelty does not have to be synonymous with stage advancement. 106. Interstage emergence and intrastage emergence can compose A trait generated while remaining at may later become an input to the transition to . Conversely, 𝑆𝐹 4 𝑆𝐹 5 𝑆𝐹 5 can create a new developmental context that causes previously existing structures to mature differently. This yields a two-dimensional developmental recursion: 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛−𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡↔𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛−𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡. One illustrative sequence is 𝑆𝐹𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 3 →𝑆𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 3 →𝑆𝐹𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 4 →𝑆𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 4 →𝑆𝐹𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 5 .
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:71.