Hypergendered Logic Source

Hypergendered Logic — Page 69

HGL Source Framework · Page 69 of 293 · Source: Hypergendered Logic

Nothing in that equation forces 
 
𝐷𝐴, 𝑡𝐴
(
) = 𝐷𝐿, 𝑡𝐿
(
)
or 
 
𝐵𝐴, 𝑡𝐴
(
) = 𝐵𝐿, 𝑡𝐿
(
).
One could be early in puberty and another sexually mature, provided the fictional causal rules allow 
 at 
𝑆𝐹
5
both maturity states. 
The same-stage label tells us what Hypergendered structure both share. It does not tell us that every 
non-stage variable is identical. 
99. Two equally mature Archfemales can occupy different stages 
The reverse underdetermination also holds. Suppose two Archfemales have the same chosen maturity state 
: 
𝐷
*
 
𝐷𝐴, 𝑡𝐴
(
) = 𝐷𝐿, 𝑡𝐿
(
) = 𝐷
*,
but 
 
𝑆𝐴, 𝑡𝐴
(
) = 𝑆𝐹
3,
 
𝑆𝐿, 𝑡𝐿
(
) = 𝑆𝐹
9.
Equal maturity does not collapse their Hypergendered orders. Thus 
 
𝐷1 = 𝐷2 ⇏ 𝑆1 = 𝑆2.
Stage and maturity are therefore cross-classifying axes. 
100. Stage order is not biological age 
No HGL axiom currently says that 
 must be older than 
, or that 
 must be more sexually mature 
𝑆𝐹
20
𝑆𝐹
3
𝑆𝑀
50
than 
. Such relationships may exist in a particular fictional species or developmental program, but they 
𝑆𝑀
10
require separate causal laws. 
Formally, 
 
𝑆𝑎, 𝑡
(
) = 𝑆𝐹
𝑛 ⇏ 𝐴𝑔𝑒𝑎, 𝑡
(
) = 𝑓𝑛
( )
for any fixed function unless the theory explicitly supplies one. 
𝑓
Likewise, 
 
𝑆𝑎, 𝑡
(
) = 𝑆𝐹
𝑛 ⇏ 𝐷𝑎, 𝑡
(
) = 𝑔𝑛
( ).
This protects HGL from an easy but unjustified assumption that “higher number” automatically means “older” 
or “more sexually mature.” 
101. A causal graph that explains why stasis does not freeze phenotype 
A useful causal skeleton is 
 
𝐵𝑡
( ) = Φ 𝑆𝑡
( ), 𝐷𝑡
( ), 𝐸𝑡
( ), 𝐻𝑡
( )
(
),
where:

Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:69.