Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 68
while still being an Archfemale, because classification depends on , not on . 𝑠𝐹≥1 𝑣𝐹> 0 Likewise an Archmale can have 𝑣𝑀= 0 and remain an Archmale. This gives a concise mathematical statement of the user’s correction: 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦/𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑦, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑖𝑡. 96. Temporary pause followed by resumption Suppose Aliza’s history is 𝑆𝐹 1 →𝑆𝐹 2 →𝑆𝐹 3, then she remains for two years, then continues 𝑆𝐹 3 𝑆𝐹 3 →𝑆𝐹 4 →𝑆𝐹 5. The two-year interval is a temporary Archstage stagnation. It does not erase , turn Aliza into a 𝑆𝐹 3 non-Archfemale, or imply that nothing female develops during those years. Her classification through the pause remains 𝐴𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒𝐴, 𝑡 ( ) = 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑒. When progression resumes, the stage velocity becomes positive again. The classification does not switch on and off with that velocity. 97. Permanent stagnation before sexual maturity Consider an Archfemale named Liora who reaches before completing puberty and never reaches . 𝑆𝐹 4 𝑆𝐹 5 Her Archwomanhood hierarchy is permanently fixed at Stage 4: ∀𝑡≥𝑡0, 𝑆𝐿, 𝑡 ( ) = 𝑆𝐹 4. The theory still permits 𝐷𝐿, 𝑡0 ( ) ≠𝐷𝐿, 𝑡1 ( ) for a later as puberty and other female development continue. 𝑡1 The layman interpretation is simple: Liora stops climbing the Archwomanhood staircase, but she does not become biologically frozen on the stair she occupies. The “stair” identifies the Hypergendered order; it does not specify every developmental property of the person standing on it. 98. Two Archfemales can occupy the same stage at very different maturities Let Aliza and Liora both satisfy 𝑆𝐴, 𝑡𝐴 ( ) = 𝑆𝐿, 𝑡𝐿 ( ) = 𝑆𝐹 5.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:68.