Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 21
SF^(alpha+1) = IH(SF^alpha) AND IH(NOT SM^alpha) AND PH(SF^alpha) AND NOT PH(SM^alpha) AND UD(SF^alpha) AND NOT FD(SF^alpha), for every defined ordinal alpha >= 2 and SM^(alpha+1) = IH(SM^alpha) AND IH(NOT SF^alpha) AND PH(SM^alpha) AND NOT PH(SF^alpha) AND UD(SM^alpha) AND NOT FD(SM^alpha), for every defined ordinal alpha >= 2 Layman master sentence Every higher Archwomanhood stage inherits the previous Archwomanhood whole, inherits the structured not-state of the corresponding previous Archmanhood whole, possesses the complete phenotype-profile of the previous Archwomanhood whole, and possesses the complete phenotype-profile of the corresponding not-Archmanhood whole. Every higher Archmanhood stage does the exact mirror image. This is now the canonical meaning of antithetically productive zig-zag logic. 25. PH laws for the higher ladder PH-1: Whole-profile possession means complete irreducible possession of the HGL phenotype-profile . 𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( ) Π 𝑆 ( ) PH-2: No converse from arbitrary trait possession Even if an organism happens to possess each familiar trait in through unrelated causes, HGL does not Π 𝑆 ( ) automatically identify that state with unless the whole-profile identity/provenance requirement is 𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( ) satisfied. PH-3: Negation scope 𝑃𝐻¬𝑆 ( )≢¬𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( ). PH-4: No distribution 𝑃𝐻𝐴∧𝐵 ( )≢𝑃𝐻𝐴 ( ) ∧𝑃𝐻𝐵 ( ), 𝑃𝐻𝐴∨𝐵 ( )≢𝑃𝐻𝐴 ( ) ∨𝑃𝐻𝐵 ( ). PH-5: No PA collapse 𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( )≢𝑃𝐴𝑆 ( ). PH-6: No IH collapse 𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( )≢𝐼𝐻𝑆 ( ). PH-7: Stage-lagged well-foundedness A stage may contain of already-defined lower stages/non-states but is not defined by of itself. Thus 𝑃𝐻 𝑃𝐻 no same-stage phenotype fixed point is required. PH-8: Profile membership deduction If 𝑇∈Π 𝑆 ( ), then 𝑃𝐻𝑆 ( ) ⇒𝐻𝑎𝑠𝑇 ( ). This is a logical deduction relative to the stipulated phenotype-profile map, not a mere causal guess.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:21.