Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 18
¬PHSM1. It is a positive phenotype-possession mode whose source happens to be a negated whole state. Strict deductions from SF2 Conjunction elimination yields all eight components. SF2⇒SF1 and SF2⇒¬SM1. SF2 also strictly entails SF2⇒PHSF1 and SF2⇒NOT PH(SM1). If the profile map specifies T∈ΠSF1, then SF2 strictly entails possession of T. If the profile map does not specify what ΠSF1 contains, the logic may not hallucinate a concrete T. 17. Canonical SM2 Symmetrically, SM2 = IH(SM1) AND IH(NOT SF1) AND PH(SM1) AND NOT PH(SF1) AND UD(SM1) AND PA(NOT x) AND PA(y) AND NOT FD(SM1) Therefore SM2⇒SM1, SM2⇒¬SF1, SM2⇒PHSM1, and SM2⇒NOT PH(SF1). 18. Negating SF2: De Morgan with eight outer conjuncts Because SF2 is an outer conjunction of eight canonical components, NOT SF2 is equivalent by ordinary De Morgan reasoning to an eight-way outer disjunction. The negation of the constitutive NOT PH(SM1) conjunct becomes positive PH(SM1); it does not become PH(NOT SM1). ¬SF2 is equivalent to the disjunction of eight outer negations: NOT IH(SF1) OR NOT IH(NOT SM1) OR NOT PH(SF1) OR PH(SM1) OR NOT UD(SF1) OR NOT PA(x) OR NOT PA(NOT y) OR FD(SF1). No term may be transformed by moving NOT through its operator. In particular, NOT PH(SF1) is not equivalent to PH(NOT SF1).
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:18.