Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 17
This is a eight-component architecture. Component 1: IH(SF1) — inherited same-side predecessor IHSF1 carries the entire Stage-1 Suprafemale state forward as inherited structure. Projection gives IHSF1⇒SF1, but SF1 alone does not reconstruct the Stage-2 inheritance relation. Components 7 and 8: standalone PA(x) and PA(NOT y) routes 𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ) and 𝑃𝐴¬𝑦 ( ) explicitly add standalone Female and Unmale developmental modes. These were not derivable from the irreducibly joint Stage-1 PA mode. Thus Stage 2 contains both the inherited joint route 𝐼𝐻𝑃𝐴𝑥∧¬𝑦 ( ) ( ) through its inherited SF1 source, and the separately instantiated routes 𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ), 𝑃𝐴¬𝑦 ( ). That is genuine causal-mode enrichment. Component 2: IH(NOT SM1) — inherited opposite-side non-state IH¬SM1 means Stage 2 inherits the structured logical non-state of first-order Supramale. It is not ¬IHSM1. The latter only denies inheritance of SM1. Component 3: PH(SF1) — whole predecessor phenotype-profile PHSF1 means Stage 2 irreducibly possesses all Hypergendered phenotypical traits canonically belonging to the whole SF1 state as the whole SF1 profile. This is not merely the conjunction of every PH atom visibly written inside the SF1 definition. The whole state can have phenotype-properties generated by interactions among its inherited conditions, PA mode, and first-order phenotype modes. If ΠSF1 contains such a whole-state emergent trait, PHSF1 includes it. Component 4: NOT PH(SM1) — explicit exclusion of complete SM1 whole-profile possession NOT PH(SM1) means Stage 2 irreducibly possesses the complete phenotype-profile associated with the logical non-SM1 whole. It is not
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:17.