Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 16
1. PA irreducibility blocks SF1 => PA(x) and SF1 => PA(NOT y) as general deductions. Those standalone PA routes first appear explicitly in SF2. 2. FemaleType(SF1) remains a separate category axiom. Female typing must not be confused with possession of the standalone PA(x) route. 3. SF1 may still participate in physical phenotype causation through the broader HGL phenotype/metaexpression model, but no exact phenotype follows merely because a constitutive PH term exists at Stage 1—there is no such PH term in the corrected canon. 4. At SF2, PH(SF1) becomes a constitutive conjunct. That is where the complete phenotype-profile of the whole SF1 state first becomes logically guaranteed by the stage formula. 14. Canonical Supramale Stage 1 The canonical first Supramale state is the exact PA-only mirror. SM1 = PA(NOT x AND y) In full condition labels: SM1 = PA(NOT XX AND XY). SM1 contains one constitutive developmental-causal mode, PA(NOT x AND y), with the compound source preserved irreducibly. Strict deduction from the definition: SM1 entails PA(NOT x AND y). No condition-source IH term, PH term, UD term, or FD term is constitutive of SM1. PA irreducibility blocks SM1 => PA(NOT x) and SM1 => PA(y) as general deductions. Those standalone routes first appear explicitly in SM2. MaleType(SM1) remains a separate category axiom, not a PA-distribution rule. PH(SM1) enters canonically at SM2 as positive same-side whole-profile possession. The opposite whole-profile is instead excluded by NOT PH(SF1). General-language PH(NOT SF1) remains syntactically legal but is not constitutive SM2 content. 15. Stage-2 phenotype antithesis versus ordinary non-possession PH(NOT S) remains a legal positive phenotype-profile possession statement whose source is a logical non-state, and it is not equivalent to NOT PH(S). However, the current canonical SF/SM successor definitions deliberately use NOT PH(opposite), not PH(NOT opposite). The distinction is therefore both semantically and constitutively important. This distinction becomes constitutively decisive at Stage 2: SF2 contains NOT PH(SM1), while SM2 contains NOT PH(SF1). These are negative whole-profile-possession claims. They do not assert possession of the phenotype-profile of the structured non-state. Thus the phenotype counterpart of the PA/IH scope lesson remains canonical, but it is no longer incorrectly attributed to constitutive Stage-1 PH terms. Part V — Second-order Hypergendered states: inherited states plus whole-state phenotypes 16. Canonical SF2 The canonical second-order Suprafemale state is the following eight-conjunct UD/FD-enriched base case: SF2 = IH(SF1) AND IH(NOT SM1) AND PH(SF1) AND NOT PH(SM1) AND UD(SF1) AND PA(x) AND PA(NOT y) AND NOT FD(SF1)
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:16.