Hypergendered Logic Source
Hypergendered Logic — Page 15
Example 4: outer disjunction of states ¬ 𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ) ∨𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ) ( ) ≡¬𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ) ∧¬𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ). Example 5: user-style double outer negation ¬𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ) ∧¬𝑃𝐴¬𝑦 ( ) ≡¬ 𝑃𝐴𝑥 ( ) ∨𝑃𝐴¬𝑦 ( ) ( ). Example 6: three-term higher-state negation If 𝑆𝑀 2 = 𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ) ∧𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∧𝑦 ( ) ∧𝑃𝐴¬𝑥 ( ), then NOT SM2 = NOT IH(SM1) OR NOT IH(NOT SF1) OR NOT PH(SM1) OR PH(SF1) OR NOT UD(SM1) OR NOT PA(NOT x) OR NOT PA(y) OR FD(SM1) Example 7: inner simplification inside one term of Example 6 The inner antithesis of is 𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∧𝑦 ( ) 𝑃𝐴¬ ¬𝑥∧𝑦 ( ) ( ) ≡𝑃𝐴𝑥∨¬𝑦 ( ). This is distinct from the outer term ¬𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∧𝑦 ( ). Example 8: nested mixed formula Let 𝑇= 𝑃𝐴¬ 𝑥∧¬𝑦 ( ) ( ) ∨¬𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ). The inner PA term simplifies to 𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∨𝑦 ( ), so 𝑇≡𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∨𝑦 ( ) ∨¬𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ). But no further collapse is justified unless additional HGL axioms connect with . 𝑃𝐴¬𝑥∨𝑦 ( ) ¬𝑃𝐴𝑦 ( ) Part IV — First-order Suprafemale and Supramale 13. Canonical Suprafemale Stage 1 The canonical first Suprafemale state is PA-only. It is not a five-part IH/PA/PH state and is not phenotype-enriched by constitutive PH terms. SF1 = PA(x AND NOT y) In full condition labels: SF1 = PA(XX AND NOT XY). SF1 therefore contains one constitutive developmental-causal mode: PA(x AND NOT y). The compound x AND NOT y remains one irreducible PA source. Strict deduction from the definition: SF1 entails PA(x AND NOT y). No condition-source IH term, PH term, UD term, or FD term is constitutive of SF1.
Source Canon: Verbatim mathematical and modal logic. Interactive navigation and operator lookups available at /#hgl-part:15.