Divine v144 Source Corpus
24. Open Variables Not Yet Fixed by Canon
| Open question | What is already fixed | What remains unspecified |
| Are Higher-Lobe orders structurally available or generated only when needed? | Resolved in this revision: for every used function, the corresponding Higher-Lobe family is structurally available without terminal order. | The precise biological mechanism by which that standing family is physically distributed across maximumless cranial architecture need not be specified for the logic. |
| Which structurally available H-orders does a particular task recruit? | Task demand D, recruitment R, and activation X are distinct sets; only demanded/recruited orders are task-relevant. | The exact biological selection algorithm mapping task-state to D/R/X remains open and can be governed by routing/metaneural control. |
| Does deeper MRD automatically cause more development? | MRD>=2 definitively means additional lower Antilobe monitoring layers failed before a later sentinel succeeded. | The quantitative law mapping MRD to anti-monitoring correction remains optional; positive-function correction must use separate deficits. |
| Can Antilobes have their own Hyperfunction ladder as an anti-monitoring function? | Antilobes are lobes and can receive factor-based development. | Whether a separate H_n ladder for the Antilobe's own function is explicitly canon. |
| Do Adeptness/Usefulness/Reliability have neutral states? | Positive and opposed states exist. | No neutral states defined. |
| Is there a universal factor threshold for H_n? | Architecture must be sufficient to realize H_n. | No universal per-factor fi(h) map. |
| How many H orders does a task recruit? | A demand profile can be defined. | Exact recruitment law. |
Leaving these explicit is preferable to silently filling them with assumptions.
Source Canon: Preserved verbatim text. Interactive cross-references and cranial annotations available at /#divine-section:311.