11.29 Conditional deductions and properties not yet forced by canon

Several powerful consequences are plausible but should remain conditional unless separately canonized.

Conditional proposition A: Higher Hyperfunction orders may increase the number or diversity of emergent dimensions available for Hyperemergent Crossfunctionality, but the exact emergence mapping is function-specific and not numerically specified.

Conditional proposition B: Heterohypercrossfunctionality may sometimes produce greater novelty than Homohypercrossfunctionality because dissimilar functions offer less redundant dimensional structure; this is plausible, not logically guaranteed.

Conditional proposition C: Repeated Hyperemergent demandingness may selectively increase Factors 9-16, 18-22 depending on the detected bottleneck, but exact factor-growth rates remain PHK- and task-specific.

Conditional proposition D: Recursive Hyperemergent depth c may itself become a direct training frontier if tasks demand deeper crossfunction-of-crossfunction composition than current routing/integration can successfully realize.

Conditional proposition E: Some network-emergent properties may become so stable and recurrent that dedicated lobe generation becomes more efficient than distributed maintenance; the exact transition threshold is not fixed.