11.28 Strict deductions from the Hyperemergent definition

Deduction 1: If no participating input contains a Hyperfunction-generated emergent dimension, the event is not Hyperemergent Crossfunctionality under this definition, even if ordinary crossfunction emergence occurs.

Deduction 2: If a Higher Lobe participates but every Hyperfunction-generated emergent dimension is causally irrelevant to the output, the event is Higher-Lobe crossfunctionality but not Hyperemergent Crossfunctionality.

Deduction 3: A regular H1 lobe can participate in Hyperemergent Crossfunctionality as long as another participant contributes an output-relevant higher-order emergent dimension.

Deduction 4: Hyperfunction order h cannot be inferred from Hyperemergent recursion depth c, and c cannot be inferred from h.

Deduction 5: Adding the numerical Hyperfunction orders of participants does not define any crossfunction order.

Deduction 6: A Hyperemergent Crossfunction need not constitute a new primary function-kind and therefore need not trigger Brain-lobe Generation.

Deduction 7: A new function-kind produced through Hyperemergence can, if it becomes a used Brain-lobe function under the generation rule, acquire its own unlimited Higher-Lobe family.

Deduction 8: Individual constituent success does not logically imply crossfunctional success because network integration is a separate layer.

Deduction 9: Hyperemergent Crossfunctionality can be homofunctional, parafunctional, heterofunctional, asymmetric regular-hyperfunctional, or polyfunctional without changing the core definition.

Deduction 10: The richest structurally available Hyperemergent possibility-space does not imply simultaneous activation of every possible crossfunction.